Moultrie Observer

Opinion

November 29, 2012

Clarification about the recently passed charter schools issue

— — — —  

Dear editor:

Prior to the vote and passage of the Charter School Amendment, Colquitt County School Board member Mary Beth Watson stated in her letter to the editor that “state charter schools will receive more state funding than their local counterparts.”

What she didn’t point out, however, was that state charter schools would receive no local funding and therefore would net less funds than a local public system.

Also, a recent item in the Rants and Rave section  of The Moultrie Observer stated in part “Passing the Charter School Amendment will affect the budget of the local school board. If a charter school is initiated then they will get local money.”

To clear up these statements, let me quote Mr. David Werner, who serves as the governor’s chief of staff for Legislative and External Affairs. Excerpts from his letter to the Atlanta Journal/Constitution are as follows:

“Information sent to local school superintendents claimed that charter schools receive more funding than traditional public schools. As you all know, no local tax money flows to state special charter schools.

“Local school superintendents and board members were adamantly opposed to any local dollars going to charter schools that were denied by a local school board and, after extensive debate, the final version of HB 797 was negotiated to ensure that this was the case.

The fact remains that these special charter  schools operate without local dollars so while their state funds appear higher they will receive only 62 percent of the total amount spent in traditional public schools.”

Mr. Werner further states that, “The cuts that Gov. Deal has asked agencies to begin planning for do not call for additional reductions in the K-12 funding formula.”

This amendment also states that it “further prohibits the deduction of certain state funds from local school districts as a direct result or consequence of the enrollment of students in state charter schools.”

Victor Beadles

Moultrie

1
Text Only
Opinion
Business Marquee
Facebook
AP Video
Tributes Mark Boston Bombing Anniversary Raw: Kan. Shooting Suspect Faces Judge US Supports Ukraine's Efforts to Calm Tensions Suspect in Kansas Shootings Faces Murder Charges Ukraine: Military Recaptures Eastern Airport Raw: Storm Topples RVs Near Miss. Gulf Coast NASA Showcases Lunar Eclipse Pistorius Cries During Final Cross-Examination The Boston Marathon Bombing: One Year Later Michael Phelps Set to Come Out of Retirement First Women Move to Army Platoon Artillery Jobs Sex Offenders Charged in Serial Killings Police: Woman Stored Dead Babies in Garage OC Serial Murder Suspects May Have More Victims Family: 2 Shot in Head at Kan. Jewish Center Raw: Horse Jumping Inspires 'Bunny Hop' After Attack, Officials Kill 5 Bears in Florida Popular Science Honors Year's Top Inventions ND Oil Boom Attracting Drug Traffickers
House Ads
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
More
weatherradar
Seasonal Content
Poll

Should abortion be legal for victims of rape?

No. That baby is alive, no matter how horrible its manner of conception.
Yes. It's wrong to force a woman to carry the child of her rapist.
Abortion is a private matter and should be legal for everyone.
     View Results